A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Kumar, Vinod
- Smokeless Tobacco - an Inferno without Smoke - a Case Series
Authors
1 Dept. of Periodontology and Implantology, Sardar Patel Dental College, Lucknow, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, Vol 4, No 1 (2013), Pagination: 176-179Abstract
Tobacco use for years has been acknowledged as a filthy habit, a corrupting addiction, and the greatest disease-producing product known to man and has been associated with oral cancer over the decades. Smokeless tobacco comes in two forms: chewing tobacco and snuff. Though it does not produce heat as compared to that produced by smoking forms of tobacco, its ill effects are no less. Addicts get a continuous or an instant "high" depending on the type of product they are using because of the nicotine present in it. Various nuclear products, pesticides and carcinogens are used in its production. To eradicate this health hazard from within our society a keen determination, awareness, education by dental specialists and cooperation from the government organizations is the need of the hour.Keywords
Chewing Tobacco, Snuff, Tobacco Specific Nitrosamines (TSNs), Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Bupropion HydrochlorideReferences
- Gerd Kallischnigg, Rolf Weitkunat,Peter N Lee:: Systematic review of the relation between smokeless tobacco and non-neoplastic oral diseases::BMC Oral Health 2008: 8:1-20 .
- Brad Rodu, Christer Jansson ::Smokeless tobacco and oral cancer: a review of the risks and determinants ::Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2004:15: 252-263
- Girish parmar,Pankaj Sangwan,Purvi Vashi,Pradip Kulkarni,Sunil Kumar:: Effect of chewing a mixture of areca nut and tobacco on periodontal tissues and oral hygiene status::Journal of Oral Science 2008:50:57-62
- ASK Sham,LK Cheung,LJ Jin,Dr.EF Corbet,::The effects of tobacco use on oral health::Hong Kong Med J 2003:9:271-277
- Nicole K. Proia, Geraldine M. Paszkiewicz: Smoking and Smokeless Tobacco-Associated Human Buccal Cell Mutations and Their Association with Oral Cancer—A Review::Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006:15:1061-1077.
- M.A. Fisher, G.W. Taylor and K.R. Tilashalski:: Smokeless Tobacco and Severe Active Periodontal Disease::Journal of Dental Research 2005:84(8):705-710.
- Newell Johnson:: Tobacco Use and Oral Cancer:A Global Perspective::Journal of Dental Education 2001:65:328-339.
- Brad W. Neville,Terry A.Day:: Oral Cancer and Precancerous Lesions; CA Cancer J Clin:2002:52:195-215.
- Microbiological Profile of Organisms Cultured from Medical Staff Mobile Phones in ICU Units at a Tertiary Care Hospital
Authors
1 Dept of Paediatrics, SSIMS & RC, Davangere, IN
2 Dept of Microbiology, SSIMS & RC, Davangere, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, Vol 4, No 4 (2013), Pagination: 34-37Abstract
Mobile phones are widely used as portable electronic devices for communication and it is in close contact with the body of health care workers (HCW). Mobile phones may serve as vectors for the nosocomial transmission of microorganisms.
Aim of this work: To evaluate the role of mobile phones in relation to the transmission of bacteria from the mobile phones to the health care workers (HCW) hands in intensive care units. This study was conducted in intensive care units(ICU); A total of 82 staff-12 Professors, 10 Associate professors, 20 Assistant professors, 4 PG’s, 15 House surgeons, 21 Nursing staff represented the materials for this study.
Samples Collection and Cultures: Obtained from the mobile phones of the participants. Isolated microorganisms were identified and allocated to appropriate genera.
Results: 21swabs showed growth of E.coli, 25 swabs showed growth of klebshiella, 10 showed growth of pseudomonas, 5 showed growth of proteus, 6 bacillus and 15 showed no growth.
Conclusion: This study confirmed that mobile phones were contaminated with nosocomial pathogens. The use of mobile phones in ICU may have serious hygienic consequences. It is needed to work at various levels to minimize the risk of mobile phones as vectors for pathogen transmission. Multidisciplinary hospital infection control teams should develop active preventive policies and stratergies to reduce crossinfection caused by mobile phones in intensive care units4.
Keywords
Mobile Phones, Nosocomial Transmission, Intensive Care UnitsReferences
- Neely A.N., Maley M.P. and Warden G.D.: Computers keyboards as reservoirs for Acinetobacter baumannic in burn hospital. Clin. Infect. Dis., 29: 1358-1360,1999.
- Borer A., Gilad J. and Smolyakov R.: Cell phone and Acinetobacter transmission. Emerged Infect Dis., 11: 1160-1161, 2005.
- Brady R.R., Wasson A., Stirling I., Mcalistter C. and Damani N.N.: Is your phone bugged? The incidence of bacteria known to cause nosocomial infection on healthcare workers’ mobile phones. J. Hospital Infect,62: 123-125, 2006.
- Jeske H.C.: Bacterial contamination of anesthetists hands by personal mobile phones and fixed phone use in the operating theatre. Anaesthesia, 62 (9): 904-6, 2007.
- Goldbatt J.G.: Use of cellular telephones and transmission of pathogens by medical staff in New York and Israeal. Infect Control Hosp. Epidemiol., 28 (4): 500-3,2007.
- Fukada T.: Anesthetists, role in computers keyboard contamination in an operating room. The Journal of Hospital Infection, 70 (2): 148-53, 2008.
- Fargeries M. and LINGAAS E.: Impact of finger rings on transmission of bacteria during hand contam. Infect Control Hosp. Epidemiol, 30 (5): 427 32, 2009. Review.
- Lapinsky S.E. and EASTY A.C.: Electromagnetic interference in critical care. J. Crit Care, 21 (3): 267-70, 2006.
- Goldbatt J.G., Kriefi, Klonsky T., Haller D., Milloul V., Sixsmith D.M., Srugo I. and Potasman I.: Use of cellular telephones and transmission of pathogens by medical staff in New York and Israel. Infect Control Hospital Epidemiol., 28 (4): 500-3, 2007.
- Semmelwies I.P.: DieAetilogie, der begriff und die Prophylaxis des Kindl Bettfiebers. Budapest: C.A. Hartlelrn’s Verlags-Expedition, 1861.
- Manning M.L., Archibald L.K., Bell L.M., Banerjee S.N. and Jarwis W.R.: Serratia marcescens transmission in a pediatric intensive care unit: A multifactorial occurrence. Am. J. Infect Control, 29: 115-119,2001.
- Wikler Matthew A.: Performance Standards for antimicrobial Disk Susceptibilety Tests; Approved Standards. Volume Mo2. A9. Ninth edition. Clinical and Laboratory Standars Institute (CLSI), 52, 2006.
- Isaacs D., Daley A. and Calton D.: Swabbing computers in search of nosocomial bacteria. Ped. Infect Dis J., 17: 533, 1998.
- Bellamy K., Laban K.L., Barreto K.E. and Btalbot D.C.: Detection of viruses and body fluids which may contains viruses in the domestic environment. Epidemiol. Infect, 673-680, 1998.
- Butz A.M., Fosarelli P., Dick J., Cusack T. and Yolken R.: Prevalence of rotaviruses on high risk fomites in day-care facilities. Pediatrics, 92: 202- 205, 1993.
- Singh V., Agarwal V., Bansalis, Garg S.P. and Chowdhary N.: Telephone mouthpiece as a possible source of hospital infection. J. Assoc. Physicians India,46: 372-373, 1998.
- Ramesh J.: Use of mobile phones by medical staff at Quean Elizabeth Hospital, Barlados: Evidence for both benefit and harm. The Journal of Hospital Infection, 70 (2): 160-5, 2008.
- Rehabilitation Using Morse Taper Design Implant Abutment Connection-a Case Report
Authors
1 Department of Periodontology & Implantology, Sardar Patel Post Graduate Institute of Dental & Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, Vol 3, No 1 (2012), Pagination: 70-71Abstract
Tooth replacement with dental implants not only restores function and esthetics but also improves confidence and self esteem. Success and predictability of dental implants depends on appropriate case selection, good occlusal harmony, and careful management of hard and soft tissues and maintenance of good oral hygiene. A 35 year old male with a missing 12 was rehabilitated with an ankylose implant which has a unique morse taper connection abutment. The resultant implant gave excellent esthetics function.Keywords
Morse Taper Connection, Micro Gap, Cone Attachment MechanismReferences
- Niznick GA. The implant abutment connection: The key to prosthetic success. Compend Cont Educ Dent 1991;12:932- 937.
- Norton M. In-vitro evaluation of the strength of the conical implantto- abutment joint in two commercially available implant systems. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:567-571.
- Mollersten L, Lockowandt P, Linden L-A. Comparison of strength and failure mode of seven implant systems: An in vitro test. J Prosthet Dent 1998;78:582-591.
- Perriard J, Wisckott WA, Mellal A, et al. Fatigue resistance of ITI implant-abutment connectors - A comparison of the standard cone with a novel internally keyed design. Clin Oral Impl Res 2002;13(5):542-549.
- Merz BR, Hunenbart S, Belser UC. Mechanics of the implantabutment connection: An 8-degree taper compared to a butt joint connection. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl 2000;15(4): 519-526.
- Prospective clinical evaluation of 1920 Morse taper connection implants: results after 4 years of functional loading .Mangano, C et.al. Clinical Oral Implants Research, Volume 20, Number 3, March 2009 , pp. 254-261(8).
- Evaluation of the ITI Morse taper implant/abutment design with an internal modification. Ding TA, Woody RD, Higginbottom FL, Miller BH. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003 Nov-Dec;18(6):865-72.